Carol Nolan (Laois-Offaly, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

954.To ask the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection to address concerns that the final value of private pensions is often significantly reduced to the level of institutional fees and government related fees; if she will agree that this approach does nothing to encourage people to pay into private pension schemes; and if she will make a statement on the matter.[34460/24]

Carol Nolan (Laois-Offaly, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

955.To ask the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection to address concerns that the final value of private pensions is often significantly reduced to the level of institutional fees and government related fees; if he will agree that this approach does nothing to encourage people to pay into private pension schemes; and if she will make a statement on the matter.[34461/24]

Heather Humphreys (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 954 and 955 together.

Firstly, I hope the Deputy will appreciate that I am unable to intervene or comment on issues relating to an individual pension scheme or pension provider.

The availability of comprehensive and transparent information on fees and charges is important and helps consumers to decide whether investments represent value for money. It is recognised that improved transparency in relation to fees and better outcomes for pension savers is always desirable.

Pension scheme trustees and administrators have responsibility for achieving good outcomes for the members and beneficiaries of their scheme. Scheme costs have an important bearing on these outcomes, and therefore trustees and administrators should know the costs that their pension scheme is incurring and be able to justify the value received for these costs.

The Deputy may be aware that in March 2021, I wrote to the Pensions Council to ask for its views on the merits of introducing an initiative similar to the Cost Transparency Initiative in the UK for pension providers in Ireland and whether such an initiative should be on a voluntary or mandatory basis. The Pensions Council July 2022 ‘Report on Cost Transparency’ recognised that mandatory disclosure may take time to achieve and recommended that any such initiative should initially operate on a voluntary basis.

In order to identify the appropriate policy responses to the measures contained in the Pensions Council report, the Pensions Authority engaged with the pensions industry on the issue of costs transparency. Arising from that engagement, the Irish Association of Pension Funds (‘IAPF’) recently announced that it is supporting and facilitating the introduction of a Cost Transparency Standard (‘CTS’) in Ireland which will enable trustees and administrators to better understand the investment costs they pay and to benchmark these costs against their peers. The Pensions Authority has committed, through its supervisory activity, to closely monitor the success of the CTS. In the longer term, in the event that the Pensions Authority is of the view that cost disclosure and comparability under the CTS are not adequate, the Pensions Authority will advise my Department of any legislative change in this area it considers may be necessary.

Of course, in addition to the CTS, there are already existing requirements imposed on scheme trustees in relation to the disclosure of information to scheme members in relation to costs as set out in –

• the Occupational Pension Scheme (Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2006 [S.I. No. 301 of 2006] made under the Pensions Act 1990;
• Regulations 31 to 37 of S.I. No. 128 of 2021 which requires trustees to provide members (active and deferred) with an annual Pension Benefit Statement (PBS) including information in respect of pension projections and costs incurred by the scheme.