Ulick Burke (Galway East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 5: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills the number of students that will be impacted by the change to the student grant criteria; the number of students who will lose eligibility as a result of the change to the adjacent rate; her views that this will act as an impediment to persons trying to upskill; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47894/10]

Mary Coughlan (Donegal South West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The allocation for student grants in 2011 is just over €385 million. This is an increase of some 5% or €18 million over the 2010 provision. Increases in the number of students qualifying for grants, increases in proportions now qualifying for higher rates of grants as well as the introduction of the student contribution paid on behalf of grant-holders each account for additional cost pressures in 2011. In order to manage these cost pressures, a number of savings measures are necessary in 2011. The measures announced will deliver overall savings of some €22 million, which has been taken into account in the 2011 provision.

A 4% reduction across the board in the rates of student grant is to be implemented for all grant-holders from January 2011. This is in line with reductions in other income maintenance payments, including those for the unemployed, and will yield an estimated saving of some €8 million. The qualifying distance criterion for entitlement to the higher non-adjacent rate of grant is to be extended from 24 km to 45 km. The existing distance has been in place since the grant schemes were introduced in 1968. Vastly improved transport facilities and road networks and better and more cost effective travelling options have altered commuting practice more generally in society over that time. Statistics indicate that some 45% of all full-time students now choose to live in their own or their parents' home during term time, yet some 77% of grant holders are currently on the higher non-adjacent rate.

The new measure will come into effect from September 2011 and will affect an estimated 18,000 students. A savings yield of some €10 million is estimated in 2011, will a full-year saving of some €30 million. The automatic eligibility of mature students for the higher non-adjacent rate of grant is to be removed from the start of the 2011/12 academic year. Mature students who reside 45 km or more from their higher education institution will continue to be eligible for the higher non-adjacent rate of grant. It is estimated that some 6,900 mature students will be impacted by this measure. The estimated projected saving is €4 million in 2011, with a full year saving of some €13 million.

While the measures outlined will result in changes to the rate of grant payable, none of the measures will result in a student losing a grant or becoming ineligible for a grant. In fact, as a result of the introduction of an additional category of eligibility for support – permitting students to qualify for 50% student contribution' – approximately 2,000 families will benefit under this revised arrangement. This progressive measure will mean that where family income is marginally in excess of the current eligibility levels for maintenance grant support, only 50% of the student contribution or €1,000, will have to be paid, rather than the €1,500 student service charge a student may be liable for under the current arrangements.

Ulick Burke (Galway East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

This is a cost-cutting exercise. The Minister referred to increasing numbers and the grants. She has already reduced the grants across the board by 4% and now she says that due to the numbers factor she must curtail them. She has introduced two changes, in particular, that relate to mature students. They totally contradict what the Government has been saying for so long about upskilling for people who have lost their jobs or whatever and are returning to education. A total of 7,000 of those people will lose out substantially as a result of these changes. They were automatically entitled to the non-adjacent grant.

Second, there is the issue of the increase of the distance from the college for the adjacent and non-adjacent grants, which will affect 18,000 students. Is the Minister expecting students to live at home? She said 45% of students live in their homes during the term. Does she expect them to make a round trip of 90 km per day to go to college as a result of the extension from 24 km to 45 km?

Mary Coughlan (Donegal South West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

First, if one has an entitlement to a grant, that entitlement will continue. The determination will be whether one is entitled to the higher non-adjacent grant or the adjacent grant. If one has a non-adjacent grant at present and one is now outside that criterion, one will continue to have access to the adjacent grant. Second, there is the issue that mature students received the higher non-adjacent grant, regardless of where they lived even if it was beside the college.

Third, the financial situation of the country is such that we are not in a position to escape savings in the Department of Education and Skills. We had to prioritise mainstream classroom teaching and, to the best of our ability, deal with the demographic issue. There is, correctly, an increase in our third level student population. We must ensure good quality of education and outcome at third level. Furthermore, the capacity of the State to continue to fund third level education is now stretched and we must examine new ways of doing it.

I accept what the Deputy is saying but it is important to assure people that they will not lose the grant if they are eligible for it. The issue is the type of grant for which they are eligible.

Ulick Burke (Galway East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Approximately 25,000 students will lose out, to the extent of between €1,500 and €3,500 depending on the category of grant. That is a serious blow, and the Minister is not serious about it. When will the Minister publish the Hunt report? If there is a serious problem, why has she not introduced the replacement of these grants, as was promised? It is awaiting introduction but the Minister dillydallied. The easiest thing to do was cut, and 25,000 students will lose out, some very substantially. It is obvious that these will drop out. The killing part of it is that the Minister is implementing from next September the commitment that they entered into originally, but not for the students who are entering now. That is a serious withdrawal and a contract with the Minister has been broken.

Mary Coughlan (Donegal South West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Fine Gael Party has proposed that it will introduce fees on a full cost basis. The Hunt report will be published at the beginning of the new year. I had hoped to have it last week, but unfortunately we do not have enough to prepare for the launching of the report, so I will do it in the beginning of the new year. We will all have to look at how we are going to sustain financially third level education. That is the harsh reality of it. There must be new ways in which income can be obtained for colleges and universities through internationalisation and through some type of student contribution.

On the student contribution side, I have put a cap on the contribution on each household, depending on how many young people are attending college, and I have introduced a new category within the student maintenance grant scheme that 50% of the contribution will also be paid. It was a matter of taking the resources that I have and using them to the best of my ability. We have seen an increase of almost €18 million on the student maintenance scheme.

Brendan Howlin (Wexford, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

That concludes Priority Questions. We must now move on to Other Questions.