Results 1,161-1,180 of 1,126,680 for in 'Dáil debates' OR in 'Committee meetings' (speaker:Pat Deering OR speaker:Cian O'Callaghan OR speaker:James Lawless OR speaker:Chris Andrews OR speaker:Simon Coveney OR speaker:Rose Conway-Walsh OR speaker:Chris Andrews6 OR speaker:Alan Farrell OR speaker:Heather Humphreys OR speaker:Danny Healy-Rae OR speaker:Pauline Tully OR speaker:Thomas Pringle OR speaker:Carol Nolan OR speaker:Verona Murphy OR speaker:Patrick O'Donovan OR speaker:Brendan Griffin OR speaker:Bríd Smith OR speaker:Pat Buckley OR speaker:Denis Naughten OR speaker:Seán Fleming OR speaker:Sorca Clarke OR speaker:Bernard Durkan OR speaker:John McGuinness)
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment agreed to.
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment No. 58:
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment agreed to.
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment No. 59:
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment agreed to.
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment No. 60:
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment agreed to.
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment No. 61:
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment agreed to.
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment No. 62:
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
James Browne: Amendment No. 62 relates to the social impact fund and inserts a new section into the Bill that provides for the possible refund of moneys transferred into the social impact fund from a licensee that transferred the balance on an account that had not been used for 13 months, and where the licensee, despite best efforts, could not make the refund to the account holder. The social impact fund...
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Brendan Howlin: An enormous amount of work has gone into this legislation. I, too, commend those Senators in the Seanad, my colleague, Senator Mark Wall, in particular and the other Senators mentioned, for a very concerted effort to get this done. Senator Wall made it clear to me today that he wanted this enacted before this Dáil ended. I also commend the Minister of State and his officials on...
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment agreed to.
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Catherine Connolly: Amendments Nos. 63 to 67, inclusive, are related and may be discussed together.
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Seanad amendment No. 63:
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
James Browne: Given the alternative debt resolution procedures that have been introduced, such as personal insolvency arrangements for example, this amendment widened the grounds for ineligibility for appointment or retention as an officer of the authority to include any other arrangements or compositions with creditors. With regard to amendments Nos. 64, to 67, inclusive, on advice from the Office of...
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Brendan Howlin: Will the Minister of State explain the narrowing of the scope?
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
James Browne: It relates to restrictions on the rights under data protection regulations and the Freedom of Information Act. Given the advice of the Attorney General it was considered that the provisions initially drafted were way too broad. As a result, the amendments were needed to reduce the application of that particular legislation as it applied to the Data Protection Act and the Freedom of...
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
Brendan Howlin: What is excluded that was included?
- Gambling Regulation Bill 2022: From the Seanad (16 Oct 2024)
James Browne: It is just the language. The Attorney General's interpretation is that the original language was simply too broad in what it would encompass. It does not go into definitions of what is or is not included. The Attorney General's view is that it would simply bring too much into it in the context of the legislation.